Favorite Saved

CASE REPORT

Progressive Slicing of Second Deciduous Molars in a Young Patient with Second-Premolar Agenesis

Congenital absence of teeth can result in poor dental positioning, periodontal damage, and a loss of vertical bone dimension, with significant consequences to both function and esthetics.1 The second premolars have the second highest prevalence of agenesis after the third molars,2,3 with a bilateral occurrence in 60% of the subjects.4,5 A number of treatment options have been proposed, the success of which depends largely on early diagnosis to allow spontaneous mesial movement of the first permanent molars into the edentulous spaces.6

Simple extraction of the second deciduous molars produces unsatisfactory results in about 75% of these cases.2 Premature loss of a second deciduous molar is more detrimental to the dental arch than the loss of a first deciduous molar.7 Patients with agenesis of second deciduous molars exhibit changes in the width of the alveolar ridge and a tendency toward mesial inclination of the first permanent molars if the situation is not properly managed during bite development.8 Other problems such as vertical bone defects, periodontal pockets, nonaxial distribution of occlusal forces on the first permanent molars, distal migration of the first premolars, and even extrusion of the antagonist molars may occur when the second deciduous molars are extracted prematurely.9,10

Another alternative for a patient with second-premolar agenesis involves maintaining the second deciduous molar in the arch while progressively slicing its distal surface, with the aim of achieving physiological mesial movement of the permanent molars.2,11 This report describes a case in which such interproximal slicing was used.

Diagnosis and Treatment Plan

An 8-year-old male was evaluated in the Preventive Dentistry section of the Universidade Estadual Paulista. Clinical evaluation revealed a mildly convex profile, a long lower face, and a passive lip seal (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 8-year-old male patient with congenitally missing upper and lower second premolars before treatment.

The patient was in the first transitory period of the mixed dentition, with a Class I molar relationship, a crossbite involving the deciduous upper left canine, and mild lower-anterior crowding. Radiographs showed bilateral agenesis of the upper and lower second premolars.

The treatment plan called for gradual slicing of about 1mm per session from the distal surfaces of the upper and lower second deciduous molars, allowing spontaneous mesial movement of the first permanent molars.

Treatment Progress

Slicing was performed whenever contact was observed between the first permanent molars and the second deciduous molars. After the third session (nine months of treatment), the patient reported dental sensitivity; to avoid greater discomfort, root-canal treatment was performed on the second deciduous molars (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 After nine months of periodic slicing of distal surfaces of upper and lower second deciduous molars and root-canal treatment of second deciduous molars.

A year after the first slicing procedure, the upper second deciduous molars were extracted, because these teeth have three roots that are practically impossible to hemisection (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Three months later, after extraction of upper second deciduous molars and hemisectioning of lower second deciduous molars.

Since the lower second deciduous molars' two roots permit hemisectioning, the slicing procedure was continued in the lower arch after removal of the distal roots.

A partial fixed appliance was placed in the upper arch to control the movement of the first permanent molars (Fig. 4A); no appliance was used in the lower arch due to anterior dental interference. Space was preserved for eruption of the upper and lower first premolars and canines. After five months, a controlled, natural mesial movement of the upper first molars could be seen, along with a gradual, physiological mesial movement of the lower first molars (Fig. 4B).

Treatment Results

Five years after the start of treatment, balanced facial characteristics were obtained, and the permanent dentition was well established with complete space closure, proper horizontal and vertical overjet, and normal molar and canine relationships (Fig. 5). Root parallelism of all teeth (including the first molars) indicated a good prognosis for stability.

Fig. 4 A. Upper fixed appliance in place. B. Five months later, wire bends added to preserve space for upper permanent canines.

Fig. 5 Patient five years after start of treatment, six months after removal of fixed appliances.

Discussion

In a case involving agenesis of the second premolars, the clinician must decide whether to maintain the second deciduous molars in the arch until exfoliation, or to extract them or progressively slice them to allow mesial movement of the first permanent molars. Maintaining the second deciduous molars will preserve the vertical and transverse dimensions of the alveolar bone,12 but can lead to root resorption and even ankylosis. If ankylosis occurs, the bite will be compromised by inclination of the adjacent teeth, which can lead to progressive infraocclusion.3,13,14

Extraction of the second deciduous molars can produce satisfactory results if the spaces are closed before eruption of the second permanent molars and complete development of the lower first-premolar roots.15 Premature extraction will reduce the quantity of alveolar bone, so that later replacement with dental implants could require bone grafting. On the other hand, agenesis of the lower second premolars is often diagnosed after age 9,4 which may be too late for spontaneous space closure.16 If the second deciduous molars are extracted at age 11 or 12, orthodontic forces will be needed to mesialize the first molars.17

In the case shown here, the patient's age allowed treatment with either extractions or progressive slicing. The latter procedure has a reported 90% success rate, in contrast to the 75% success and other potential drawbacks of second-molar extractions.2,8-10 The major advantage of slicing is the facilitation of a more physiological movement of the first permanent molars. In the present case, a fixed upper appliance was used only to prevent undesirable tipping and rotation of the first molars, thereby avoiding the need for further orthodontic intervention. The patient finished with a healthy periodontium, a normal bone structure, parallel dental roots, and a satisfactory occlusion.

REFERENCES

  • 1.   Silva Meza, R.: Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients, Int. J. Paediat. Dent. 13:112-116, 2003.
  • 2.   Valencia, R.; Saadia, M.; and Grinberg, G.: Controlled slicing in the management of congenitally missing second premolars, Am. J. Orthod. 125:537-543, 2004.
  • 3.   Fines, C.D.; Rebellato, J.; and Saiar, M.: Congenitally missing mandibular second premolar: Treatment outcome with orthodontic space closure, Am. J. Orthod. 123:676-682, 2003.
  • 4.   Rølling, S.: Hypodontia of permanent teeth in Danish school children, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 88:365-369, 1980.
  • 5.   Bergström, K.: An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia, supernumeraries and other anomalies in school children between the ages of 8-9 years: An epidemiological study, Swed. Dent. J. 1:145-157, 1977.
  • 6.   Hodnett, S. and Ngan, P.: Early management of congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: A case report, J. Pediat. Dent. Care 13:32-33, 2007.
  • 7.   Macena, M.C.; Tornisiello Katz, C.R.; Heimer, M.V.; de Oliveira e Silva, J.F.; and Costa, L.B.: Space changes after premature loss of deciduous molars among Brazilian children, Am. J. Orthod. 140:771-778, 2011.
  • 8.   Ostler, M.S. and Kokich, V.G.: Alveolar ridge changes in patients congenitally missing mandibular second premolars, J. Prosth. Dent. 71:144-149, 1994.
  • 9.   Shellhart, W.C. and Oesterle, L.J.: Uprighting molars without extrusion, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 130:381-385, 1999.
  • 10.   Sakima, T.; Martins, L.P.; Sakima, M.T.; Terada, H.H.; Kawakami, R.Y.; and Ozawa, T.O.: Alternativas mecânicas na verticalizaçäo de molares: Sistemas de força liberados pelos aparelhos, Rev. Dent. Press Ortod. Ortoped. Fac. 4:79-100, 1999.
  • 11.   Northway, W.: Hemisection: One large step toward management of congenitally missing lower second premolars, Angle Orthod. 74:792-799, 2004.
  • 12.   Kokich, V.: Early management of congenitally missing teeth, Semin. Orthod. 11:146-151, 2005.
  • 13.   Bjerklin, K. and Bennett, J.: Long term survival of lower second deciduous molars in subjects with agenesis of premolars, Eur. J. Orthod. 22:245-255, 2000.
  • 14.   Kokich, V.G.: Managing orthodontic-restorative treatment for the adolescent patient, in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ed. J.A. McNamara and W.L. Brudon, Needham Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 2001, pp. 423-452.
  • 15.   Svedmyr, B.: Genealogy and consequences of congenitally missing second premolars, J. Int. Assoc. Dent. Child. 14:77-82, 1983.
  • 16.   Lindqvist, B.: Extraction of deciduous second molar in hypodontia, Eur. J. Orthod. 2:173-181, 1980.
  • 17.   Kokich, V.G. and Kokich, V.: Congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: Clinical options, Am. J. Orthod. 130:437-444, 2006.
  • OSMAR APARECIDO
    DR. CUOGHI
  • MARCOS ROGÉRIO DE
    DR. MENDONÇA
  • KELLY REGINA
    DR. MICHELETTI
  • YÉSSELIN MARGOT
    DR. MIRANDA-ZAMALLOA
  • LAERCIO SANTOS
    DR. DIAS

Drs. Cuoghi and Mendonça are Assistant Professors and Drs. Micheletti, Miranda-Zamalloa, and Dias are postgraduate students, Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry, Discipline of Preventive Orthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1193 José Bonifácio St., Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil. E-mail Dr. Micheletti at mai.

Fig. 1

DR. RAVINDRA NANDA BDS, MDS, PhD

My Account

This is currently not available. Please check back later.

Please contact heather@jco-online.com for any changes to your account.