THE READERS' CORNER
1. Do you have a method for identifying uncooperative patients before treatment?
About 80% of the respondents said they had no particular method. Suggestions from those who felt they were able to judge cooperation included:
How early in treatment do you measure cooperation?
Well over half the clinicians started to measure cooperation as early as possible, often within the first three months. This evaluation could start with the patient's response to separators and the initial oral hygiene instructions. Other responses ranged from every month to every six months. Specific comments included:
What do you do about noncooperation?
A large majority said they began by having personal talks with the patient and parents. This was often followed by letters to the parents, and finally, if necessary, a change in the treatment plan.
The biggest problems mentioned were compliance with headgear wear (72% of the respondents) and oral hygiene (66%). Poor elastic wear was mentioned by 47%, followed by functional appliance wear (28%) and maintaining appliances in good condition (22%). Only 15% said that keeping appointments was a problem.
Suggestions for dealing with noncooperation included:
Do you do anything special for cooperative patients?
More than 80% of the clinicians reported that they did not do anything special either during or after treatment. During treatment, the most common response was verbal praise, followed by giving small rewards (stickers, inexpensive toys, etc.) and acknowledgment of cooperation with a "patient of the month". After treatment, some practitioners sent special letters to patients and parents; a few others gave certificates. Suggestions included:
2. How do you correct upper first molars that are rotated mesial-in?
About two-thirds of the practitioners used fixed appliances; most of the rest used transpalatal arches. Occasional mention was made of headgear, cross-elastics, and lip bumpers.
Do you overcorrect? If so, by how much?
Fifty-six percent of the clinicians overcorrected molar rotations. The amount was most frequently expressed as either 5-10° or 1-2mm.
How do you retain the corrected positions?
A large majority felt there was usually little relapse associated with this procedure, and therefore they used their regular retention procedures. In more than 80% of the responses, this involved a maxillary Hawley-type retainer, perhaps with Adams clasps to retain the molars as well as the appliance.
JCO wishes to thank the following contributors to this month's column:
Dr. Scott P. Arbit, Milwaukee, WI
Dr. Raymond Barbre, Arlington, TX
Dr. Maurice J. Belden, Presque Isle, ME
Dr. Eugene C. Brown, Jackson, MS
Dr. Charles Buchanan, Albany, NY
Drs. W. Jerry Capps and J. Richard Moulton, Atlanta, GA
Dr. William H. Claypoole, Durham, NC
Dr. Olwyn Diamond, Baltimore, MD
Dr. Rodney C. Dubois, Bellevue, WA
Dr. David Engst, Bellingham, WA
Dr. Gerald Ginsberg, Phoenixville, PA
Dr. Barney M. Hom, Manhattan Beach, CA
Dr. Leif B. Johannessen, Wakefield, NH
Dr. Donald C. Jordan, Tacoma, WA
Dr. Michael F. Kelly, Suffern, NY
Dr. Marcel Korn, Fitchburg, MA
Dr. William J. Kottemann, Maple Grove, MN
Dr. Thomas A. Kroczek, Griffith, IN
Dr. Lester L. Luttrell, Griffin, GA
Dr. William A. Laughlin, San Jose, CA
Dr. Barry I. Matza, Boca Raton, FL
Dr. E.M. McFarland III, Pittsburgh, PA
Drs. David J. McKenna, John C. McKenna, andPaul J. McKenna, West Hartford, CT
Dr. Barry D. McNew, Greenville, TX
Dr. Charles E. Meyers, Fort Meade, MD
Dr. Terry L. Moore, Hurst, TX
Dr. William S. Rothschild, Succasunna, NJ
Dr. Mark Rothstein, San Diego, CA
Dr. H.G. Stringert, Pueblo, CO
Williamsville Dental Group, Williamsville, NY