THE READERS' CORNER
1. What is your preferred retention procedure? Have you noticed differences in relapse with or without retention? How do you handle patient cooperation in the retention period?
Types of Retainers
Readers almost universally preferred a Hawley-type retainer for maxillary retention. They frequently mentioned the advantage of a wraparound retainer, with no wires crossing the occlusion, in allowing for settling of the occlusion. Using a flat wire for the labial bow, to better control incisor rotations, was also suggested.
Considerable variation was reported in the retention procedures used in the lower arch, with influence given to factors such as the amount of lower incisor crowding and whether extractions had been performed. The bonded cuspid-to-cuspid retainer was the most popular choice, particularly in nonextraction cases. The banded cuspid-to-cuspid retainer was advocated by those who were concerned with potential dislodging of the bonded variety. "Zachrisson" bonded retainers (for both arches) and light-cured composites were also mentioned.
Suggestions included:
Retention Duration and Relapse
Several practitioners commented on wanting "lifetime retention", but recognized that this might not be practical. The most common regime was to wear the retainers until growth was complete and the third molars had been dealt with. Six to 12 months of full-time removable retainer wear, followed by nighttime wear, was most commonly suggested.
The clinicians almost unanimously reported an increased incidence of relapse without retention, and many felt uncomfortable about having patients go for even short periods without retainers.
Patient Cooperation
The readers felt the best way to ensure continued cooperation was to remind patients and parents constantly of the possibility of relapse. Comments included:
2. If a child says that he or she does not want to have orthodontic treatment, how do you deal with that?
Without exception, readers said they would not start treatment if the patient clearly indicated that he or she was not interested. Comments:
JCO wishes to thank the following participants in this month's column:Dr. John P. Doley, Williamsburg, VADr. Lamont R. Gholston, Louisville, KYDr. Lloyd R. Griffith, Port Angeles, WADr. Kim Nga Nguyen-Khuong, Houston, TXDr. Peter I. Pfaffenbach, Schenectady, NYDr. Stephen C. Roehm, Peoria, ILDr. Gary R. Wolf, Norwalk, OHDr. Barry F. Wood, Williamsville, NY