Favorite Saved
July 1970
Volume 4, Issue 7

THE EDITOR'S CORNER

EUGENE L. GOTTLIEB DDS

I want to propose an orthodontic think tank and suggest two functions for it. The think tank would be an Orthodontic Research and Development Corporation. It would be an independent, nonprofit organiz...

369

Treatment of Class II, Division 1 Maximum Anchorage Cases with the ACCO Appliance

LEONARD BERNSTEIN DMD

This paper presents the sequential treatment procedures that I follow in my office in the use of the ACCO appliance in treating Class II, division 1 maximum anchorage cases. Pertinent information conc...

374

JCO Interviews Robert M. Ricketts

SIDNEY BRANDT DDS, Interviews Editor

384-jco-img-4.jpgDR. BRANDT: The next statement with which you do not agree is that teeth cannot be intruded, so overbite must be corrected by extrusion of posterior teeth. Now, your point about intru...

384

TECHNIQUE CLINIC

Class III Elastics Against Cervical Headgear Force

JOSEPH G. DI STASIO DMD, MDS

Very often early in the treatment of our moderate to maximum anchorage cases, we desire a distal force against the lower arch during leveling, anchorage preparation, cuspid or anterior retraction, or ...

402

JCO Cooperative Practice Problem Study: The Impacted Maxillary Cuspid

404-jco-img-0.jpgA summary of the first 150 reports in the JCO Impacted Maxillary Cuspid Study is shown in the accompanying chart. If additional reports make any significant change from what is report...

404

Retrospective on Progressive Dentofacial Changes After Treatment and Retention, Part IV

MAXWELL S. FOGEL DDS, JACK M. MAGILL, DDS

Cases (Continued) Patient S.S. Again, I would like to point out the dramatic changes in facial profile (Fig. 15), from an apparent bimaxillary protrusion to a complete concave profile, after nine year...

407

My Account

This is currently not available. Please check back later.

Please contact heather@jco-online.com for any changes to your account.