 |
Responses to the JCO Survey of Referring
Dentists offer orthodontists many clues about
forming better relationships with GPs. The survey
was mailed on June 30, 2003, to an arbitrary
sampling of 5,000 general dentists from the
American Dental Association list. Another mailing
was sent on Sept. 5, 2003, to 2,500 different
general dentists. A total of 539 answers were received,
for a response rate of 7.2% ( Table 1 ). It should be emphasized that because of the
small sample size, this is more of an opinion poll
than a scientific survey. Our objective was to
obtain dentists' views and comments about how
and why they refer patients to particular orthodontists
and what kinds of communication they
find valuable. ResultsThe respondents reported that the most
important factors in the GP-orthodontist relationship
were the orthodontist's treatment results,
their patients' satisfaction with their orthodontic
treatment, and the orthodontist's reputation
( Table 2 ). Good communication about mutual
patients before, during, and after treatment was
fairly close behind (when "very important" and
"somewhat important" were combined).
Convenient location of the orthodontist's office
was considered at least somewhat important by a
sizable majority. Whether the orthodontist offered
free initial consultations and the dentist's
friendship with the orthodontist were the least
important. Responses to the JCO Orthodontic
Practice Studies have indicated, however, that the
offer of a free initial consultation is of some
importance to patients, and cultivating the friendship
of GPs certainly couldn't hurt. Around three-quarters of the respondents
indicated that they would like the orthodontist to
refer patients back to them for their periodic dental
check-ups ( Table 3 ). Nearly as many encouraged
staff-to-staff relationships. The dentists
were about equally divided on whether they
would like to share their x-rays with the orthodontists or have the orthodontists take their own x-rays. Respondents expressed a strong desire for
written reports about their patients before and
after treatment, accompanied by patient photographs
( Table 5 ). There was some interest in
seeing photographs of patients' models, but relatively
little interest in cephalometric tracings. When asked how they would like to be
communicated with, a large majority of the dentists
favored regular mail ( Table 6 ). More than
half wanted telephone communication. It was
interesting that fewer than 10% preferred e-mail. Considering that there was at least some
interest shown by respondents to this survey in
every aspect of the GP-orthodontist relationship,
it would be helpful for orthodontists to find out
the preferences of the dentists in their own areas.
Toward that end, we offer a survey form that
could be sent to those dentists ( Fig. 1 ). Dentist Comments ([table=4]Table 4[/img])Many respondents to the JCO Survey of
Referring Dentists offered interesting comments,
some of which are listed below: Not enough orthodontists doing early orthopedic
interceptive treatment in my area.Orthodontists must treat TMJ as well.Why do some orthodontists not treat the second
molars? I have seen braces off before the
second molars are fully erupted.It would be nice to be kept informed of treatment
so I could learn and better evaluate what is
going on treatment-wise with the more advanced
cases. Solely to better my understanding.I do a moderate amount of orthodontics
myself, and I am always interested in the diagnosis
and treatment planning of my patients that I
refer. Our local orthodontist does a nice job of
sending an initial diagnosis letter, but it would
also be helpful for him to send a note at the end.Orthodontists should be acutely aware of
occlusion and equilibration.Orthodontists are extremely hard to convince
GPs know anything about ortho!I never get any communications after the first
treatment letter, and the letter is usually esoteric.When further professional consultations are
needed (i.e., periodontist, oral surgeon), I want to
be included in the decision on where to refer the
patient.Referrals to the general dentist are an important
part of the relationship.It would be nice to have orthodontists be more
aware of the periodontal status of the teeth.Consult about cosmetic procedures and options.Orthodontists rarely refer patients back for
periodic exams.Referring to an orthodontist who gets along
with teen-agers is a big deal!I have found in 25 years of practice that about
half the female patients who have bicuspids
extracted and who wore headgear experience
TMJ problems starting in their 20s. I refer to
orthodontists who allow the maxilla to develop
naturally and bring the mandible forward to
match it, and who expand or distalize rather than
extract.If it is obvious that the patient is not keeping
regular prophylaxis appointments, then a referral
by the orthodontist would be helpful.Orthodontists need to provide the general dentist
with written records and photos. A phone
conversation is a stress on my patient schedule
and has too much detail to remember accurately.I expect my orthodontist to refer restorative
patients to me.Communication is the key. The best orthodontists
utilize available technology to communicate
with me, photos included, with diagnostic evaluation
and continual updates.Wish all orthodontists understood more about
the function of the dentition and what it will look
like 10+ years after treatment.I want bands and bonds to be as free of leaks
as possible.I want minimal invasion of brackets, wires,
etc., into gum tissue.Orthodontists should be willing to treat minor
tooth movements.It is important that archwires be removed at the
time of prophylaxis so I can really scale and polish
the teeth.I observe that most orthodontists give the
impression that they are too busy to send information
about treatment to the general dentist. It
is important to us to be able answer questions by
patients or parents, which we cannot do without
proper information. My feeling is if we take the
time for the referral, they should send information
to us before, during, and after treatment."Free" initial consultations for patients are
attractive.It is very important to get new patient referrals
from an orthodontist.I want enough information to understand treatment
and answer questions from patients or parents.Orthodontists need to stress the need of periodic
check-ups and prophies with the general
dentist.I expect treatment to CR.Every case is "comprehensive". I have had a
number of complaints, but have no avenue of
redress.I see frequent root resorption and unadjusted
occlusions.Too many orthodontists (at least in our area)
have expanded too much the duties of their assistants.I do not refer to an orthodontist if my patients
have problems with excessive cement or resin
not cleaned off, wire problems, etc.Having recently completed orthodontic treatment
myself, I recognize the need for better communication
between the restoring dentist, periodontist,
oral surgeon, and orthodontist. More
communication is necessary when implants and
restorative issues need to be addressed.The orthodontists in my area are so busy they
don't seem to do much interceptive orthodontics
on young kids. They seem to let a problem develop
longer than I like to see.Emphasizing routine dental cleanings and
check-ups is critical!Suggest patient-specific diagnostic records,
not blanket prescriptions.Lateral cephs are way overdone.
Tables
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
ROBERT G. KEIM, DDS, EDD, PHD
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
|
Dr. Keim is Editor of the Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 1828 Pearl St., Boulder, CO 80302.
|
EUGENE L. GOTTLIEB, DDS
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
|
Dr. Gottlieb is Senior Editor of the Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 1828 Pearl St., Boulder, CO 80302.
|
ALLEN H. NELSON, PHD
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
|
Dr. Nelson is Director and Research Consultant, Nelson Associates, Nederland, CO.
|
DAVID S. VOGELS III
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
|
Mr. Vogels is Managing Editor of the Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 1828 Pearl St., Boulder, CO 80302.
|
Table 1
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
Table 2
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
Table 3
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
Table 4
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
Table 5
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
Table 6
VOLUME 38 : NUMBER 04 : PAGES (219-223) 2004
|
|
 |
|
 |